Search for: All records

This article examines the challenges and opportunities in extracting causal information from text with Large Language Models (LLMs). It first establishes the importance of causality extraction and then explores different views on causality, including common sense ideas informing different data annotation schemes, Aristotle’s Four Causes, and Pearl’s Ladder of Causation. The paper notes the relevance of this conceptual variety for the task. The text reviews datasets and work related to finding causal expressions, both using traditional machine learning methods and LLMs. Although the known limitations of LLMs—hallucinations and lack of common sense—affect the reliability of causal findings, GPT and Gemini models (GPT-5 and Gemini 2.5 Pro and others) show the ability to conduct causality analysis; moreover, they can even apply different perspectives, such as counterfactual and Aristotelian. They are also capable of explaining and critiquing causal analyses: we report an experiment showing that in addition to largely flawless analyses, the newer models exhibit very high agreement of 88–91% on causal relationships between events—much higher than the typically reported inter-annotator agreement of 30–70%. The article concludes with a discussion of the lessons learned about these challenges and questions how LLMs might help address them in the future. For example, LLMs should help address the sparsity of annotated data. Moreover, LLMs point to a future where causality analysis in texts focuses not on annotations but on understanding, as causality is about semantics and not word spans. The Appendices and shared data show examples of LLM outputs on tasks involving causal reasoning and causal information extraction, demonstrating the models’ current abilities and limits. 

In this research, we take an innovative approach to the Video Corpus Visual Answer Localization (VCVAL) task using the MedVidQA dataset. We expand on it by incorporating causal inference for medical videos, a novel approach in this field. By leveraging the state-of-the-art GPT-4 and Gemini Pro 1.5 models, the system aims to localize temporal segments in videos and analyze cause-effect relationships from subtitles to enhance medical decision-making. This paper extends the work from the MedVidQA challenge by introducing causality extraction to enhance the interpretability of localized video content. Subtitles are segmented to identify causal units such as cause, effect, condition, action, and signal. Prompts guide GPT-4 and Gemini Pro 1.5 in detecting and quantifying causal structures while analyzing explicit and implicit relationships, including those spanning multiple subtitle fragments. Our results reveal that both GPT-4 and Gemini Pro 1.5 perform better when handling queries individually but face challenges in batch processing for both temporal localization and causality extraction. Despite these challenges, our innovative approach has the potential to significantly advance the field of Health Informatics. In this research, we address the Video Corpus Visual Answer Localization (VCVAL) task using the MedVidQA dataset and take it a step further by integrating causal inference for medical videos. By leveraging the state-of-the-art GPT-4 and Gemini Pro 1.5 model, our system is designed to localize temporal segments in videos and analyze cause-effect relationships from subtitles to enhance medical decision-making. Our preliminary results indicate that while both models perform well for some videos, they face challenges for most, resulting in varying performance levels. The successful integration of temporal localization with causal inference can provide significant improvement for the scalability and overall performance of medical video analysis. Our work demonstrates how AI systems can uncover valuable insights from medical videos, driving significant progress in medical AI applications and potentially making significant contributions to the field. 

This article presents a state-of-the-art system to extract and synthesize causal statements from company reports into a directed causal graph. The extracted information is organized by its relevance to different stakeholder group benefits (customers, employees, investors, and the community/environment). The presented method of synthesizing extracted data into a knowledge graph comprises a framework that can be used for similar tasks in other domains, e.g., medical information. The current work addresses the problem of finding, organizing, and synthesizing a view of the cause-and-effect relationships based on textual data in order to inform and even prescribe the best actions that may affect target business outcomes related to the benefits for different stakeholders (customers, employees, investors, and the community/environment).